Friday, January 31, 2020
What is Chivalry Essay What is Chivalry Originally Latin, actually spelled Ã¢â¬Å"caballarius and pronounced Ã¢â¬Å"SHivÃâ¢lrÃâÃ¢â¬ , is chivalry. Chivalry is the combination of qualities expected of an ideal knight. Such qualities include honor, courtesy, courage, justice, and willing to assist those in need. If one is chivalrous in character, then one is a gentleman and noble in his good deeds. He would in no manner hesitate to serve others and serve his God. This is evident as Honore de Balzac puts it: Ã¢â¬Å"the motto of chivalry is also the motto of wisdom; to serve all, but love only one. Ã¢â¬ Chivalry, besides its original usage as Ã¢â¬Å"calvary,Ã¢â¬ can truly only be delineated in only one way, which is to refer to a virtuous code of conduct. There isnÃ¢â¬â¢t any negative connotations to the word either, unless somebody called a fellow thane chivalrous in Old Anglo-Saxon times! Other than that, the only emotional association with the word is generally positive. This noble idea of conduct is constituted of several virtues in spite of the narrow usage of the word. So, how did chivalry come into existence? Journey to the medieval times and you will discover that chivalry was once an existential characteristic of every man sworn into nobility or born into it. These men were knights. Medieval knights battled horseback and practiced outstanding gallantry. Knights were always calvary in battle, and exhibited righteous morals. A group of knights was actually called Ã¢â¬Å"the chivalryÃ¢â¬ of the militia. They were excelled in sword craft nearly comparable to their high level of graciousness, and could ride a horse well-nigh to the speed of which they are willing to assist a damsel in distress. Chivalry came to be known as the demeanor of an ideal knight, rather than simply a group of knights. As Chaucer puts it in Canterbury Tales, an ideal knight loved chivalry, truth and honor, freedom and courtesy; a very gentle, perfect knight.Ã¢â¬ Whatever happened to chivalry? Certain writers may say chivalry is dead, or it might just have a bad case of the flu. As long as wrongs are still righted, chivalry will survive. Chivalry cannot and will never die out. It may become exponentially less evident everyday, but underlying all the rudeness and discourtesy, chivalry is there. Chivalry does indeed need to be implemented more and more into society. Every single manÃ¢â¬â¢s major desire should be to act magnanimously and reveal a generous and noble state of mind. If every man were to be genuinely chivalrous then hardly would there ever be any cheating, debt, adultery, stealing, or even bad attitudes. Each and every man would be true in their religion, honest, courteous, and would have a burning passion to do what is right. Think of that chivalry based utopian society. A world where people were more worried about humbling themselves rather than raising themselves up would be phenomenal. Modern chivalry should predominate like it did with Sir Lancelot around Queen Guinevere. Contemporary America could learn from John BowringÃ¢â¬â¢s Ã¢â¬Å"ChivalryÃ¢â¬ poem which reads: Ã¢â¬Å"Now tell me what is chivalry? To battle in the foremost fight For anythingÃ¢â¬âfor wrongÃ¢â¬âfor right, For some fair ladys scornful smile, For what is virtuous, what is vile, Come, tell me, is this chivalry? No! in the men for truth who pant, In wretchedness and woe and want, Who bear the worlds contemptuous hate, With patient soul, with heart elate. No! in the woman in whose home No peace is found, no comforts come, Yet bends in silence,Ã¢â¬âfeeling still Tis Gods most kind, most holy will. ThisÃ¢â¬âthis is truest chivalry!Ã¢â¬ Chivalry essentially is the essence of all that is good, virtuous, and holy, conglomerated into one admirably cultivated code of conduct to live by.
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Anne Bradstreet Anne Bradstreet was a woman in conflict. She was a Puritan wife and a poet. There is a conflict between Puritan theology and her own personal feelings on life. Many of her poems reveal her eternal conflict regarding her emotions and the beliefs of her religion. The two often stood in direct opposition to each other. Her Puritan faith demanded that she seek salvation and the promises of Heaven. However, Bradstreet felt more strongly about her life on Earth. She was very. She was very attached to her family and community. Bradstreet loved her life and the Earth. There are several poems of Bradstreet that demonstrate this conflict. There is Ã¢â¬Å"Upon the Burning of Our House July 10th, 1666Ã¢â¬ and the ones written on the deaths of her grandchildren. These are both examples of her feelings about life on Earth and her religious beliefs. In the critical essay of Robert D. Richardson Jr., he examines the poem Ã¢â¬Å"Upon the Burning of Our HouseÃ¢â¬ from a conventional Puritan point of view, Ã¢â¬Å"an exercise in finding the hand of God behind every apparent disaster. Yet, the poem moves back and forth from the human level to the divine, and it is not impossible to argue that the human level Ã¢â¬â fear of fire, the sense of loss is what genuinely moves the poet, while her submission to the will of God is somewhat forced acknowledgment of an arrangement that is not really satisfactory.Ã¢â¬ (105) And when I could no longer look, I blest his Name that gone and took, That layd my goods now in the dust: Yea so it was, and twas just. It was his own: It was not mine; Far be it that I should repine. (311) These lines of submission are clipped and measured, grimly singsong: they sound forced when placed alongside the following lines which emphasize personal loss. (Richardson 105)Here stood that Trunk, and there that chest There lay that store I counted best: My pleasant things in ashes lye. Anne uses the proper application, interpreting the event as a warning, and as an injunction to look toward the Ã¢â¬Å"house on high erect.Ã¢â¬ But the vacillation in the poem suggests that the sense of loss outweighs, at least at times, the potential comfort promised by Puritan theology. (Richardson 106) In the critical essay by Ann Standford, Ã¢â¬Å"Anne Bradstreet Dogmatist and Rebel,Ã¢â¬ she tells us that Anne Bradstreet Ã¢â¬Å"comforts herself with good Pur... ... she used her poetry. She was able to do this in a subtle way. Yet she expressed her feelings and her questioning about Puritan theology. Were her conflicts ever fully quieted within her? There is some evidence that towards the end of her life she was able to accept her fate. Anne Bradstreet died on September 16, 1672 at the age of sixty. She was very ill in the last months of her life. Her works reflect the tension and conflict of a woman struggling for artistic expression. She was troubled by religious doubts throughout her life yet managed to be a successful mother and wife. Her belief in the beauty of this world helped her maintain a belief in a heaven. Bibliography: Martin,Wendy. An American Triptych. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984. Richardson Jr., Robert D. Ã¢â¬Å"The Puritan Poetry of Anne BradstreetÃ¢â¬ Critical Essays on Anne Bradstreet. Ed Pattie Cowell and Ann Stanford. Boston: Hall 1983. 101 Ã¢â¬â 115. Stanford, Ann. Ã¢â¬Å"Anne Bradstreet Dogmatist and RebelÃ¢â¬ Critical Essays on Anne Bradstreet. Ed Pattie Cowell and Ann Stanford. Boston: Hall 1983. 76 Ã¢â¬â 88.
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
School Uniforms: They are definitely to be worn School uniforms have long been a topic of debate between those who believe the public school system should offer personal freedoms and those who believe it helps provide an appropriate environment for learning. There are many reasons uniforms can be helpful in enhancing the student's learning experience. It helps if you look at these dress codes as you would a uniform for work, as school is a child's work. While uniforms may be costly for parents, they save money in the future with trends changing, laundry, and students can focus on learning.So unlike trying to catch up with the different season styles, you could say that uniforms are a timeless investment. Some students may find it difficult to find an outfit to wear in the morning, particularly females. But when you have a school uniform, you are provided with a relatively easy selection of what to wear to school. Uniforms help to change the attitude of those wearing them. Unlike regu lar clothing choices, you are not likely to pick on someone wearing the exact same thing as yourself. Many schoolyard fights have begun with someone making fun of someone else regarding the clothing they are wearing.Dressing nicely also helps students to Ã¢â¬Å"live up to their clothing. Ã¢â¬ There is an innate sense of decorum when we dress for success. People tend to act differently depending on the clothing they are wearing. By creating a uniform specifically designed for attending school, the attitude falls in line. When those clothes are on, it becomes as regular as putting on pajamas, so a brain knows it is time to focus and learn. If a student could choose their own apparel, could you even imagine the amount of laundry oneÃ¢â¬â¢s parents would have to do?Consider this; a new pair of under garments, a shirt or blouse, shorts or jeans, possibly a jumper, some socks, and even some extra clothes for recreational activities, multiplied by every day of the week, and add in eve ryone elseÃ¢â¬â¢s clothes! A lot of people have two, three or even four children so as you could imagine, this would be extremely unnecessary. School uniforms have the potential to save parents money on clothing. Plain uniform clothing is less expensive than the brands that middle and high school students like to wear. Furthermore, because there is no variety in a chool uniform, children who wear them need fewer outfits in their wardrobes. Having a uniform is popular in secondary and intermediate schools. Some people believe that primary schools should be included, and I agree completely. As mentioned before, kids and teenagers go through a lot of clothing. But could you imagine a little boy running around the playground ripping his new clothes? I believe that having a uniform would help teach children to respect their belongings. It also saves money down the track with trends changing constantly, and this can prove to be very costly for parents.Having a compulsory uniform represe nts the school as being tidy and disciplined, whereas mufti would give the impression of low standards. Uniforms should definitely be in schools all over New Zealand. They save time in the morning deciding what to wear and students can concentrate on the learning, instead of trying to impress others. They do not form as many problems with students and teachers do not have to deal with bullying or other negative comments. Uniforms are an all-around money and time saver. While some uniforms are not attractive they give the wearer a sense of equality. By Niki
Monday, January 6, 2020
Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 569 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/07/03 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Women's Suffrage Essay Did you like this example? Pros and Cons regarding the new amendment that our congress has passed. Women would be able to start up their own business or get their own job and have their own carrier without asking her marriage partner permission she would have more opportunities in this country but she could also have her own medical care transportation vehicles and more associations. The rights of the amendment are considered a bit weird and misunderstood but at the same time that could lead to less of equal gender rights. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Womens Suffrage Campaign" essay for you Create order But this also opens a door with enough space for the interpretation which is why those who look at the amendment U.S has passed say that it will take away some rights for women but while adding other rights for women. Women have been mistreated and not treated with the same rights as men until the amendment u.s congress has passed. The amendment established the right for women to vote it also gave women the right to have a say in this country. The amendment us congress passed was about equal rights and sexual equality. There werent really any downfalls to this amendment u.s congress passed it was more of an upgrade for sexual equality. The amendment gave women new opportunities and have their own careers and not be a stay home housewife. In my opinion I think women should have had rights of a man before the amendment even took place. Most of the federal law that doesnt agree on the equal rights of sex will be eliminated for good. The gender equality situation would start to become an illegal situation but as any preconception that is viewed on someones gender. Even though it wouldnt stop the society of the united states from keeping their personal views but it would shrink are the judgment of way how people take a look at the gender equality situation. It could also be a better perspective is to take an legal enforce on anyone who disobeys. Now its true by adding equal rights to the fourteenth amendment in the constitution would cause a miraculous amount of changes with the laws the government has given us. Now this also puts women in danger like laws that so a point of view of discarding the rule/law that puts women to working in mining jobs except for a type of working space environment for an example an office. This also could cause problems in the constitution like one of the major concerns is that it could influence the way laws are being made. If it ever comes to women working in mines they would be opposed to danger even though the men have had more experience with their careers more than women. Now ask yourself this would a high pay be worth it another con is that is the people that support the amendment of the U.S congress passed but however it was viewed as any other of the states but we will still have the authority to put the provisions of the document. Now the way they are doing it is the same way as their doing it with the thirteenth and fourteenth amendment or any other of various amendments that were already made. They also will have about seven hundred and thirty days to make a variety of changes to any law that points out violence towards the gender equality disagreement.